As we move into summer mode and dust down those flip flops, it’s the perfect time to reflect on the promotional marketing rulings so far in 2024. The ASA upheld several complaints this year that highlight the importance of complying with the Code when running your campaign. Though perhaps not as exciting as a glittering campaign launch, ensuring the legal elements of your promotion are in order will help ensure your hard work producing that shiny new promotion has not gone to waste.

As we move into summer mode and dust down those flip flops, it’s the perfect time to reflect on the promotional marketing rulings so far in 2024. The ASA upheld several complaints this year that highlight the importance of complying with the Code when running your campaign. Though perhaps not as exciting as a glittering campaign launch, ensuring the legal elements of your promotion are in order will help ensure your hard work producing that shiny new promotion has not gone to waste.

30% of Rulings Missing Significant Conditions

With a whopping 30% of all rulings referencing the omission of significant conditions, it’s clear that this is the issue of the year to date as evidenced in the Heinz ruling from January and Space NK ruling from February, both illustrating that even the biggest brands can sometimes get it wrong. Including just a QR code to direct consumers to more information is not sufficient currently and doesn’t work in lieu of proper short terms. This may change in future as the landscape evolves but for now, though QR codes are popular, they’re not popular enough to replace the requirement for short terms.

30% of Rulings Missing Significant Conditions

With a whopping 30% of all rulings referencing the omission of significant conditions, it’s clear that this is the issue of the year to date as evidenced in the Heinz ruling from January and Space NK ruling from February, both illustrating that even the biggest brands can sometimes get it wrong. Including just a QR code to direct consumers to more information is not sufficient currently and doesn’t work in lieu of proper short terms. This may change in future as the landscape evolves but for now, though QR codes are popular, they’re not popular enough to replace the requirement for short terms.

“With a whopping 30% of all rulings referencing the omission of significant conditions, it’s clear that this is the issue of the year to date as evidenced in the Heinz ruling from January and Space NK ruling from February, both illustrating that even the biggest brands can sometimes get it wrong.”
IPM Regulatory Affairs Manager, Manny Roberts

Why Short Terms Matter

These rulings highlight another important issue around engagement with terms from consumers. Though we sweat on full terms and ensure they contain all the right clauses and details, the reality if that the vast majority of consumers will never read them despite their best intentions and their only engagement with the promotion will be the short terms. This means that though they are brief in nature, the details provided on-pack or wherever your short terms are used are key in helping ensure the smooth progress of your promotion.

But what if space is restricted?

It seems clear that the more legal information you include when advertising a promotion, the less risk there is overall. ‘But what if space is restricted?’ I hear you ask.  Well, good question as the Code does make allowances for this situation but it’s key that design elements haven’t been prioritised over any legal requirements. It’s a subjective area which makes it even harder to navigate but with space constraints linked to three rulings so far this year including Kingsland Drinks, it’s important promoters find the right balance between alluring messaging and compliance requirements.

Ensuring the basics are right is essential to ensure that promotions aren’t affected by an oversight in an area that may not be the most glamorous but performs the important function of maintaining trust in the promotional marketing sector and thus paving the way for future marketing success.

A fundamental tenet of the rules governing how we work is that promoters are responsible for all aspects of their campaign, a key but often overlooked fact. This means that from start to end, they must work to avoid any form of participant disappointment and ensure all elements of the promotion are conducted fairly.

Witcombe Festival and Future Farms Rulings

It sounds straightforward but the rulings against Witcombe Festival in February and Future Farms in May show that it’s easy to make an error. This was actually Witcombe Festival’s 2nd upheld ruling after a similar decision in 2022 so it’s essential that lessons are learnt and mistakes aren’t repeated to avoid additional regulatory scrutiny. Future Farm’s lack of response didn’t help their cause and though perhaps a complex process, working with the ASA as much as possible can help to mitigate some of the impact of their investigation.

It sounds straightforward but the rulings against Witcombe Festival in February and Future Farms in May show that it’s easy to make an error. This was actually Witcombe Festival’s 2nd upheld ruling after a similar decision in 2022 so it’s essential that lessons are learnt and mistakes aren’t repeated to avoid additional regulatory scrutiny. Future Farm’s lack of response didn’t help their cause and though perhaps a complex process, working with the ASA as much as possible can help to mitigate some of the impact of their investigation.

The regulatory side of your new promotion will never be the most exciting part of constructing the campaign however working through the key legal details could save you bother just when you should be toasting its success. It’s not easy to find the right line between commercial priorities and legal necessities so contact the IPM’s legal team to guide you through the journey. Now, where’s that bucket hat and spade, we’re off to the beach…

IPM Legal Advisory Service

If you need expert guidance to navigate these complexities and ensure your promotions are compliant, contact the IPM Legal Advisory Service for professional support.

“With a whopping 30% of all rulings referencing the omission of significant conditions, it’s clear that this is the issue of the year to date as evidenced in the Heinz ruling from January and Space NK ruling from February, both illustrating that even the biggest brands can sometimes get it wrong.”

IPM Regulatory Affairs Manager, Manny Roberts

Why Short Terms Matter

These rulings highlight another important issue around engagement with terms from consumers. Though we sweat on full terms and ensure they contain all the right clauses and details, the reality if that the vast majority of consumers will never read them despite their best intentions and their only engagement with the promotion will be the short terms. This means that though they are brief in nature, the details provided on-pack or wherever your short terms are used are key in helping ensure the smooth progress of your promotion.

What If Space Is Restricted?

It seems clear that the more legal information you include when advertising a promotion, the less risk there is overall. ‘But what if space is restricted?’ I hear you ask.  Well, good question as the Code does make allowances for this situation but it’s key that design elements haven’t been prioritised over any legal requirements. It’s a subjective area which makes it even harder to navigate but with space constraints linked to three rulings so far this year including Kingsland Drinks, it’s important promoters find the right balance between alluring messaging and compliance requirements.

Ensuring the basics are right is essential to ensure that promotions aren’t affected by an oversight in an area that may not be the most glamorous but performs the important function of maintaining trust in the promotional marketing sector and thus paving the way for future marketing success.

A fundamental tenet of the rules governing how we work is that promoters are responsible for all aspects of their campaign, a key but often overlooked fact. This means that from start to end, they must work to avoid any form of participant disappointment and ensure all elements of the promotion are conducted fairly.

Witcombe Festival and Future Farms Rulings

It sounds straightforward but the rulings against Witcombe Festival in February and Future Farms in May show that it’s easy to make an error. This was actually Witcombe Festival’s 2nd upheld ruling after a similar decision in 2022 so it’s essential that lessons are learnt and mistakes aren’t repeated to avoid additional regulatory scrutiny. Future Farm’s lack of response didn’t help their cause and though perhaps a complex process, working with the ASA as much as possible can help to mitigate some of the impact of their investigation.

The regulatory side of your new promotion will never be the most exciting part of constructing the campaign however working through the key legal details could save you bother just when you should be toasting its success. It’s not easy to find the right line between commercial priorities and legal necessities so contact the IPM’s legal team to guide you through the journey. Now, where’s that bucket hat and spade, we’re off to the beach…

IPM Legal Advisory Service

If you need expert guidance to navigate these complexities and ensure your promotions are compliant, contact the IPM Legal Advisory Service for professional support.

News

News